Monthly Archives: January 2008

The Mailing List Game

Mailing lists. Ahhh, memories. In my earlier wine drinking days I was a listaholic. Not as bad as some, but somewhere between 15 and 20 lists and winery clubs at my peak. Now I’m down to two regular purchases.

For those uninitiated, mailing lists are offers from wineries to purchase wine directly from them. In some cases, this is the only way to purchase wine from a particular winery. In some cases, demand so outstrips supply that wineries have waiting lists to get on their mailing lists, and in a few, the wineries have actually closed their waiting lists because those lists are so long there is no realistic prospect of new waiting list members ever getting onto the mailing list.

I was always fan of the mailing list model (when not abused by means of hostage wines and other nonsense) as it allowed me to cut around the idiotic three tier system of wine (and beer and whisky) distribution that we are cursed with. My money, and all of it, went directly to the person making the wine (less the shipping costs). I like that idea. However, with the advent of children, school tuition, and other fun elements of “real life” virtually every mailing list had to go. This was relatively painless as my palate was finding itself most pleased by wines that are, politely put, not sold by mailing list.

As I admitted, there are two exceptions. First, Edmunds-St. John, an old favorite, and the single largest domestic presence in my wine cellar by a long shot (8.54% of my total cellar, and actually passing Dönnhoff for #1 overall – thanks, Cellartracker!). Love the wines, love the way I can actually match them easily with food, and really enjoyed meeting Steve Edmunds both on line and in person. Edmunds-St. John is somewhat available in Missouri, but I’d just as soon get them directly from Steve.

The second producer is new – Rhys Vineyards. I was turned on to them by Florida Jim, as fine a gentleman as I’ve met through the various wine fora in which I’ve participated over the years. Jim and I have similar palate preferences, and when he was impressed by an early visit to the property I threw my name on the mailing list (they had yet to release a wine). I had to pass on the first offering due to life priorities at that moment, but bit when they made a second chance offering to those who had passed.

The pinot noir I purchased, the 2004 Alesia Sonatera, was really delicious. Definitely Californian, but with a refreshing acid structure that kept it lively. I also had purchased the 2004 Alesia Chileno Vally Syrah Sonoma Coast, but based on some wine board notes that it was extremely reduced, I had not opened one yet. Well, since the next Rhys mailer is expected to hit sometime this month, I thought it was time to crack one to see how they handled Syrah, so I could make a better decision about whether I would pick any up or not.

As I’d been warned, it was heavily reduced on opening. So I splash decanted it last night, returned it to the bottle and saved it for tonight. Much, much nicer tonight, though there is still a hint of reduction. The color is a deep, almost black purple. The nose has bright red fruits (cranberry, tart cherry) mixed with a good dose of black olive and wet clay. It lacks the over ripeness that plagues a lot of California cracks at this variety. Prior to tasting it, I’d probably guess Northern Rhone from a relatively ripe year (or so I’d like to think). In the mouth, it’s much bigger with more richness than I expected from the nose, but there is substance there too, in the form of decent acidity and a firm, but fine, tannic spine. A very nice effort, and I’ll leave my other bottle to age for a couple of years. I may pick up a bottle from the next offering, but I know I love what Steve Edmunds does with Syrah, and he doesn’t make any Pinot Noir . . . .

Alright, I’m adding a bit to this as I finished this bottle last night.  It was at its best yet.  More fruit, less olive, but still distinctly Syrah.  Just lovely stuff.  No rush here.

Metro St. Louis wine lovers rejoice!

Andrew from Bon Vivant Wines recently let me know that he now has access to the Louis/Dressner portfolio of wines. A good 20% of my cellar is comprised of Louis/Dressner wines as Joe Dressner has a stable of great wine producers from some of my very favorite places in France (or are these my favorite places in France because of the wine Mr. Dressner imports from them?). Louis/Dressner has also started importing from Italy, but I’ve not yet had the chance to taste these wines. Let’s hope that changes with Andrew’s access!

I’ve been mail-ordering these wines from retailers primarily on the East and West Coast for the past 5 or 6 years, and picking up the odd bottle that I might find in Chicago. It will be great to have access to Clos Roche Blanche, J.P. Brun, Desvignes, Breton, et al., and be able to support a local wine shop doing it.

Twenty Buck Luck, Chapter 1

Thanks to Carl for the great idea on the name for this new feature!

Our first three contenders from my local Schnuck’s have been sniffed, tasted, sampled and spit, and here are the results:

(1) 2005 Mondavi Woodbridge Zinfandel California ($5.99) – 13.5% per label

Why did I pick this wine? I have a soft spot for Zinfandel. Always have. Something about that spicy fruit. And some serious respect for Lodi Zin after reading Rhoda Stewart’s interesting (if a bit fawning) A Zinfandel Odyssey, particularly for those who grow for the Mondavi Woodbridge operation. I figured it would be a solid wine, and it was. It actually turned out to be my favorite of this batch.

Clear medium ruby. The initial nose offers somewhat confected overripe strawberry, mixed with that distinctive Lodi earthiness – sort of a wet, leaf-heavy loam. The nose eventually comes together more compactly still led by strawberry, but it’s more restrained and simple, but pleasant. Pretty slim in the mouth where a dried mushroom note leads the way, well (if modestly) supported by slightly spicy fruit. Good length, and just a scratch of tannin at the death. This bottle held up the best of the three on day 2. In fact, it was virtually unchanged. Ditto on day 3.

(2) 2006 Robert Mondavi Private Selection Cabernet Sauvignon California ($8.77) – 13.5% per label

I chose this one since it was marked down from $13.99 to $8.77 – a whopping 37% off. Why? I just had to know.

Much deeper color – bordering on a full purple. The initial nose is a pretty classy mix of ripe plum and raspberry. It’s all fruit, but it’s nice fruit and not overdone. Medium-bodied in the mouth, with not a lot of complexity. Raspberry leads a linear, somewhat compacted palate. There is a slight creaminess to the mouthfeel, and a decent bit of tannin. Over time though, this really falls apart. After a couple of hours of air, the nose is pretty much gone, and the palate reduced to a wet tannin delivery system. The tannins aren’t out of line, but when that’s all there is . . . . No improvement on day two.

(3) 2006 the Little Penguin Shiraz Southeast Australia ($6.49) – 13.5% (yeah, right) per label

Why? I don’t know. Well, yes I do. I have a somewhat morbid fascination with the “critter” wines that populate so much of the grocery store wine section. Grape Radio, an excellent wine podcast, did a two part (I, II) interview with the managing partner of Yellow Tail, that I found fascinating. I tried a couple of their wines as a result. I didn’t like them, but I understood what they were shooting for, and it certainly manifested itself in the glass. Since the success of that brand, seemingly countless pretenders have sprung up. The Little Penguin seems to garner significant shelf space and was on sale, so I thought I’d give it a go. Oops.

Light bright purple/pink in the glass. It almost seems iridescent. Super fruity in the glass – like someone fermented Luden’s cherry cough drops. There’s a slight menthol-y herbal note in the background, but this soon surrenders to the avalanche of fake fruit. The only thing I can compare it to is Yellow Tail, but this seems even more forced (although I grant that the bottle of YT was over a year ago, and it might be just as offensive – maybe it will be on sale soon). Thick and downright sweet in the mouth with significant rough tannins and very apparent alcohol. This is really unpleasant stuff. Time does it no favors, apart from some diminution in the offensive fruit aromas – they’re still there, but they no longer fill the room on day two. Tannins are even more obtrusive and now somewhat bitter to boot. It was a satisfying act of revenge to pour two-thirds of the bottle down the drain (sorry, drain) – though not as satsifying as getting my $6.50 back would have been . . . .

So, there it is, the first chapter is complete. I’ll be drinking some better, less random stuff to recover, but I look forward to the next installment of Twenty Buck Luck.

Moving on over

Just a quick move to WordPress.  Ahhh.

A new year, a new feature!

I will admit to the occasional impulse purchase when it comes to things alcohol-related. These impulses used to cost me a lot of money, but now I’m more inclined to keep them fiscally in check.

It also helps me to have a direction. So, here’s the new idea. Whenever the buying bug bites me, I’m going to hit the wine section of my neighborhood Schnuck’s (which is actually a really nice wine section) and purchase at least 3 wines for the princely total (not including tax for the anal retentive out there) of about $20. For those distracted by my (neverending, though you should be used to it by now) parentheticals, that’s three bottles out the door for a total bill (less tax) of $20. I’ll be grabbing whatever looks interesting to me – whether it seems a particularly good or bad value, has a cute label, a terrifying label, freakishly high or low alcohol, got a mysteriously high rating from some wine rag or another. Whatever. The only cavaets being: (1) price; (2) available at the grocery store; and (3) it must intrigue me somehow.

I just made a mid-afternoon run, and have three candidates (one was marked down from $13 to $8 – that’s almost 40% off! Needless to say, I couldn’t resist finding out why.) lined up. I’ll open them tonight, and follow them over the next couple of days. I expect most to be, well, workmanlike (i.e. a grape-based alcohol conveyance system), but I’m sure some will be horrific, and I just might find a gem or two.

If you’ve got a clever idea for the name of this feature, feel free to post it in the comments. I thought about it for 30 or 40 seconds and drew a blank. Immortality on the Internet awaits!

Also, I have lots of holiday wine notes that may, or may not make it up. Regardless, I drank pretty well, and got back into the habit of making some notes, so that was good. On the down side, I’m pretty much taking a health-related break from beer (but not wine or whisky) for the next few months, so the focus of the blog will skew a bit over that time. Sorry about that. Wine and whisky are good too, my gentle beer people. I promise.